Insolvency Act criminal offences & the cover up
‘Op Blackjack’ – Insolvency Act 1986 criminal offences by liquidator and the criminal cover up by The 21 Cards of Injustice, Dean Beale, Inspector General and Chief Executive Officer of the Insolvency Service and his Legal Services Directorate.
In our launch release, we documented City of London Police living up to their standards earning the City the international reputation as the economic crime capital of the world.
In our launch release we showed how City of London Police relied on the perversions by Sir Geoffrey Vos to continue in their quest to conceal the conspiracy by 21 Cards of Injustice, 21-double dealing judges.
This one’s a straight flush. A suit of cards of all the same pack. They broke not only the civil rules of the game, making up for the deficit by those at the bottom of the Championship League, with outright cheating, but they made themselves above the criminal law the same.
Getting to their game, the Supreme Court’s final judgment in the case of Ivy v Genting Casinos established the new test for dishonesty in civil and criminal proceedings. Cheating is dishonest.
“Misdealing” is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as to “make a mistake when dealing cards“, or dealing wrongly / incorrectly. How ironic?
Failing to administer the law, is a mistake when dealing, but this was no mistake, they were all double dealing.
Vos was one of the double dealers, therefore he knew what he was doing in concealing material facts and perverting the truth, was absolutely dishonest, and, being in his position, he must have known it also had tendency to pervert.
It was easy to prove the lies by the second highest judge in the UK. They may be full of deceit, but they are hopeless criminals. Good criminals don’t create a trail of evidence behind them.
“No evidence” claimed Vos, but we found all the evidence that was right before him.
Evidence proving offences by the Official Receiver of London, has always been a matter of open public record.
It wasn’t just Vos and his cabal of referees turned strikers for Tory Boro, police, and all ministerial departments stonewalling to cover the crimes. It was the duty of Dean Beale, Inspector General to have reported the offences he knew about, to his legal services directorate for prosecution.
Beale, like the rest of them and his legal department, all relied on the 21 Cards of Injustice to cover up. The truth was easily in reach.
They did the public purse out of at least £100,000 in fines through their cover up and perversion, whilst you, the taxpayer are paying them to act dishonestly.
Judges can only occupy office whilst on good behaviour.
So, it was finally determined by Vos that Hannon, the Official Receiver of London, was acting as liquidator of Earth Energy Investments LLP (“EEI“).
EEI, TEAM WIND’s investment vehicle had a claim arising from pre-liquidation mutual dealings against MFC / TEAM BLACKMAIL exceeding £1 million including statutory interest, on the same date!
The claim that Hannon was under a duty to have collected in, was based on the assignment from EW to EEI, which he was lying about. Vos covered up Hannon’s lies when he recorded that Hannon said in a letter to Court of 15 May 2018 that “no such claim was assigned under the alleged assignment, or at all“.
The simple illustrated 52-second video contains snippets from the official transcript of a High Court hearing on 5 February 2018, proves that 3-months prior, both the barrister for MFC and a High Court Judge were saying that the EEI statutory demand sum was the investment assigned from EW to EEI.
Over a year later, in court on 6 November 2020, evident on the official transcript, Mr Justice Fancourt (No. 10 of 21) and Dov Ohrenstein, the fraudster barrister acting for TEAM BLACKMAIL who replaced Staunton after his lies caught up with him, said this about the assignment of the investment from EW to EEI:
It was finally determined that the assignment originating the claim vested in EEI of over £1 million, which was then assigned back to Millinder personally, was never determined at all.
It once again proved that Hannon had committed perjury in his letter to Court, a lie told both with intent to defraud and pervert.
Vos knew by his own admission that both EEI and EW had claims arising through pre-liquidation mutual dealings, and that Hannon was misdealing by failing in his duty to administer rule 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules 2016, the law on set off.
Uncoincidentally, this is the same fraudulent abuse that gave cause for Millinder to make his originating application against Hannon in relation to the wind turbine operating company (Empowering Wind MFC Ltd / “EW“).
That was misdealing in relation to both companies which Vos lied about, and yet there was not a whisper, not a single reference to the law on insolvency set off anywhere in any of the purported determinations in the Millinder case. That’s the ace card, the fraud that lies at the heart of it.
Insolvency Act criminal offences committed by the liquidator of TEAM WIND
The Insolvency Act 1986 creates a number of criminal offences when a person does, or fails to do certain acts which are prescribed within the statutory law.
The offence is complete, if, within 14-days after his appointment, the liquidator fails to publish in the London Gazette Official Public Register, and deliver to Companies House, a statutory notice of his appointment.
Evidence to prove the offence
There were two simple places we would get the evidence, as prescribed by the law which creates those offences. Firstly, the London Gazette, and secondly, the Companies House public record for EEI. Both of which, any member of the public can access.
We did the same in respect of EW to compare, just looking at the London Gazette public record, here’s the result:
The London Gazette notice history for EEI shows that Hannon did not advertise notice of his appointment as liquidator. The evidence proves that Hannon was not even lawfully appointed, Mr Dionne was.
By way of comparison, Hannon was acting a liquidator of EW when he fraudulently failed in his fiduciary duty to have administered the mandatory law of due process in rule 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules 2016, because TEAM BLACKMAIL, never had a claim against TEAM WIND, and TEAM WIND had a claim against TEAM BLACKMAIL for over £10 million, originating because of their BLACKMAIL.
Is that not misdealing, conspiracy and fraud?
Below, we show you the evidence that Mr Hannon did, at lease advertise notice of his appointment as liquidator of EW:
It is proven beyond doubt, to the criminal standard, with evidence, that Hannon has committed a criminal offence which crossed over with his fraudulent abuse of position, acting to deprive Millinder, EW and EEI of a statutory right of which they were entitled.
Mr Dionne, the elusive public official, a senior figure in the Insolvency Service, never appeared at all in the EEI liquidation, yet he was the one lawfully appointed.
Mr Dionne has committed 4 of those offences on multiple counts, (aside from failing to notify his appointment), in respect of EEI. Hannon has, in respect of both companies.
Beale and his legal services cabal have been covering up those offences to prevent justice being served on the offenders. That is, for avoidance of doubt, perverting the course of public justice.
Criminality is therefore easily established in Millinder’s case, aside from looking at the obvious fraud.
Schedule 10 of the Insolvency Act 1986 prescribes the punishment of offences committed under it. We list the fines from Schedule 10 of the Insolvency Act, the offences by a liquidator, which is the screen shot below:
We observe that the Official Receiver of London, deployed to double deal as liquidator of both TEAM WIND’s companies, had committed all of the 5 summary offences above on no less than 22 counts.
Not only that, but Hannon’s offending under the Insolvency Act 1986 crossed over with fraudulent abuse of position. Fraud is not a victimless crime.
The fines against the Official Receiver & loss to the public purse through perversion
The offence of section 109 of the Act is subject to a fine of a fifth of the statutory maximum.
From 12 March 2015, law removed the £5,000 cap that used to limit the maximum fines magistrates could impose.
On that basis, and given the aggravated nature of Hannon’s offending, it would be conservative considering the circumstances to assume a punishment of a £5,000 fine for that offence.
Hannon failed to have remedied his violation and on 16 July 2019 Hannon dissolved EEI to defraud Millinder, a creditor he owes a fiduciary duty of over £1 million.
The daily default fine is a fiftieth of the statutory maximum, which, prior to March 2015 was £5,000, so the daily default fine for the continued contravention is £100, applying 14-days from making the insolvency order against EEI on 28 March 2018 through to when he dissolved EEI acting outside jurisdiction to defraud its creditors.
The daily default fine accrues therefore from 11 April 2018 – 16 July 2019, so, 469 days. The fine Hannon has evaded is £51,900.
Lies, lies cover up and more lies intended to obstruct the course of public justice
At paragraph 105 of his 8 February 2019 judgment, Vos told another lie:
Vos told a lie because he knew that on 9 January 2017, in Court as recorded on the official transcript, Staunton, for TEAM BLACKMAIL, had to concede by stating “for the purpose of the Energy Supply Agreement, force majeure has effect“.
It is evident therefore that counsel for Boro / TEAM BLACKMAIL, knew on 9 January 2017 that £181,269.89 of the first claim was fictitious, but yet he attended Court then claiming over £4 million for energy supply, from November 2017 onwards.
£181,269.89 of the BLACKMAIL was for energy supply. £75,000 was for rent, and Vos knew that on 9 January 2017, Staunton also lied about force majeure in the lease, because no rent was owed either.
Contrary to the false assertions by Vos, Millinder did not need to bring any claims, because rule 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules 2016, the mandatory law of due process, determined that TEAM BLACKMAIL’s claim was to have been set off entirely against TEAM WIND’s claim, which as of 19 August 2015 when it became due and payable, was over £9.2 million net!
Vos lied and said it was a “quantified claim for rent” knowing that £181,269.89 of it was an invoice for energy supply when there was no agreement to supply power, and that no rent was owed because force majeure had effect.
City of London Police based their decision not to investigate the serious offence of perverting the course of justice by 21 judges on the decisions by Vos, who we have proven to have seriously perverted the truth.
The public interest & the rule of law
Broadly, the presumption is that the public interest requires prosecution where there has been a contravention of the criminal law.
Public integrity is essential for advancing the public good and ensuring the legitimacy of public organisations. It is also considered an antithesis to corruption, as recognised by articles 7 and 8 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC).
It is of paramount importance in the public interest that the rule of law is maintained and that means “an independent justice system, free from interference from outside, free from corruption, free from influence, that is respected and treated as independent by those in Government and those in Parliament, and that ultimately, the public has confidence in the ability of the courts and the responsibility of the courts to take decisions according to their best judgment about what the law of the land requires.”
Our question to you, after reading this, would you go and use the courts to seek justice in the UK after being wronged by any public official or anyone connected with one?
We have asked the Lord Chancellor, the Lady Chief Justice, Dean Beale and the Insolvency Service, City of London Police and Corporation, the Cabinet Office and Number 10 Downing Street, to comment.
Like, comment and share this article far and wide.