Game changing AI justice investigations

‘Operation Blackjack’s groundbreaking A.I based fact finding services combine legal acumen with state-of-the-art intelligence gathering and investigatory excellence.

We deploy A.I (Artificial Intelligence) search generated results to get to the end game. With 100% impartiality and accuracy.

AI search establishes the facts straight down the line, from kick off to the last goal, uncovering the cover up in seconds. We replace the human fact finder with 100% accurate, impartial A.I generated outcomes. A.I does not lie. 

In our quest to restore just governance, law and order, we throw a major spanner in the works of the British establishment’s corruption machine, a gamechanger.

AI justice – Search generated impartial fact finding investigations

Operation Blackjack’s AI justice investigations resolve what would take an investigator or judge days, weeks or months, with AI generated outcomes delivered in seconds.

We deployed A.I to prove dishonest concealment and perversion in a number of high profile cases.  The results enabled re-opening of cases that were otherwise closed, proving beyond doubt that there had been ‘purported determinations’ and dishonest concealment of fact.

Uncovering lies and dishonest concealment

CASE STUDY: Earth Energy Investments LLP v the Official Receiver of London & Middlesbrough Football & Athletic Company (1986) Ltd

We featured the Earth Energy Investments LLP case as testimony as to how our investigatory services get to the end game.

It was alleged that the judges involved, the Government Legal Department, Treasury Solicitor, Law Ministers and lawyers for Middlesbrough Football Club told lies to conceal what was never determined. They were all saying it was ‘finally determined‘, and was found to be ‘totally without merit‘, meaning that the case was no more or less than bound to fail.

In R (Wasif ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 82, at p.19 – 20 the Court of Appeal set this important criteria to be followed by the High Court and Upper Tribunal when considering a ‘totally without merit certification’, which we cite below:

“But where the application is certified as TWM, so that the claimant has reached the end of the road (subject to appeal), peculiar care must be taken to ensure that all the arguments raised in the grounds are properly addressed. This is not just for the important reasons of principle discussed in Flannery v Halifax Estate Agents Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 377 and in the many other authorities to the same effect. There is the further point that if permission to appeal is then sought from this Court, real difficulties can be caused if the judge refusing permission at first instance has not given adequate reasons, particularly since the option of directing an oral hearing is not open.

20. All the claimant’s points must be identified and addressed. If there are professionally pleaded grounds, those grounds should be taken in turn. If, however, as is alas too often the case, the grounds are discursive or repetitious, it is the Judge’s responsibility to analyse them into their component parts and say why each fails to give the claimant a realistic prospect of success“

The vital point 急所 (kyuusho)

Millinder’s case was all about a fraud, dishonest deprivation of statutory set off rights, the rights granted in the scheme of law, insolvency set off; Rule 14.25 Insolvency (England & Wales) Rules 2016.

Millinder’s firm, Earth Energy Investments LLP (“EEI“), a creditor, applied to Court under Rule 14.11 of the Insolvency Rules 2016 in relation to a proof of debt that was admitted by the Official Receiver, contrary to his statutory duty to have set off the Middlesbrough FC proof of debt, against the claim vested in the company; Empowering Wind MFC Ltd (“EW“), which exceeded 10 million.

The two key words we established for the A.I search based investigation we deployed are inextricably linked, going back to the same point at issue so we performed one search of each and combined the two results:

100% A.I generated, 100% impartial outcomes on examination of the facts and evidence and this boiled down to a comparative game of numbers, which speak for themselves.

Contact us for details.